Friday, December 11, 2009

I have begun reading The Elder by Cornelis Van Dam (Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing, 2009). It is 283 pgs including the index. It is one of five (more to come) volumes in the Explorations in Biblical Theology series.
My professor, mentor, and friend, Robert A. Peterson, is the editor of the series, and I am thankful that he gave the book to me. I am sure that I will make some more comments about the book after I complete it, but I am excited about how the book will strengthen my walk with the Lord and service to his church.
Also, if the book is as I expect it to be, then I will use it for elder training in the future. The book covers the OT and the NT teaching about the biblical office of elder. It comes with study questions (243-251) and an excellent bibliography for further reading about the office (253-255). Please check back soon for my evaluation of the book.

Saturday, September 12, 2009

Christ-Centered Worship: Letting the Gospel Shape Our Practice

Natalie purchased a copy of Bryan Chapell's new book, Christ-Centered Preaching: Letting the Gospel Shape Our Practice, from the Covenant Seminary Bookstore yesterday. I have only read a couple of pages so far, but I am extremely excited about this book.
I would recommend that all Reformed pastors purchase a copy and begin reading today. The book asserts that the gospel should shape the practice of corporate, public worship.
In addition to this book, Reformed pastors should also be sure to own a copy of The Directory for Publick Worship (1645) and Robert Rayburn's O Come, Let Us Worship (1980). There are certainly other titles on Reformed worship, but this is a good place to begin.

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Preach the Word - Part III - The Context of Preaching

Second, Paul paints a picture of the CONTEXT of preaching in verse 1: "I charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the dead, and by his appearing and his kingdom..." In painting this picture for us Paul places preaching with the eternal context of Christ, his Second Coming, the final judgment, and the kingdom to come. Today, if you were to ask a seminarian about the context of preaching, he (or she!) would surely respond with comments about preaching to a postmodern culture and how the preacher needs to adapt his message for postmodern ears (narrative preaching, etc.). The student would speak ad nauseam about this need for "contextualization," and there is no doubt that there would be some helpful tips to learn from him. After all, even the Apostle Paul "contextualized" his message for a pagan audience at Mars Hill (Acts 17:22ff.). Even though this sort of "contextualization" has its place within our understanding of preaching, it is instructive that Paul provides no primer on "cultural contextualization" for Timothy. Instead of making the temporal context the focus of the preaching imperative, Paul makes the eternal context the driving force behind the command to preach the word. John Piper came to Covenant Seminary some time ago (before I was a student), and he delivered a couple of messages about preaching for the seminary. I have listened to these "lectures" (of course, they are really sermons, not lectures), and my favorite is the message entitled, "Preaching in the Presence of God." Piper addresses the context of preaching in this message, and he emphasizes the fact that the charge to preach and the act of preaching both occur within the presence of the risen Christ who will return and judge the living and the dead. So then, when we, preachers, enter the pulpit, we should be aware of this stunning reality. We should endeavor to picture Jesus Christ enthroned and exalted. We should emply our sanctified imagination in order to see him on his throne. We should think about men, women, and children from every tribe, tongue, people, and nation standing before him and giving an account for every word, thought, and deed. This should sober us. It should provoke a holy tremble in our hearts and perhaps in even in our speech and demeanor. We cannot be trivial in the pulpit or cute or clever when eternity is at stake. Moreover, the sermon becomes much more than a speech, and the preacher becomes much more than a public speaker. In a very real sense, the sermon becomes the message from the mouth of the cosmic judge, Jesus Christ, through his messenger, the preacher. Likewise, the preacher becomes the man who stands in the presence of this Jesus and seeks to bring him and this eternal reality to bear upon the hearts of his people. He seeks to unveil this reality by means of expounding the written word (cf. 2 Timothy 3:16). Thus the context of preaching is the eternal reality of Jesus Christ, his Second Coming, and the final judgment, and this context should shape both the sermon and the preacher.

Sunday, September 6, 2009

The Big Picture

I preached a sermon this morning from Colossians 1:15-20 that I entitled "The Big Picture." The central assertion of the sermon is that the confession "Jesus is Lord of all" is the big picture of life. Some people call "the big picture" a worldview or a comprehensive paradigm. It is a framework for understanding all of reality. I presented my sermon in four sections: 1. The Subject of the Big Picture (Jesus is Lord of Creation and the Church), 2. The Scope of the Big Picture (Jesus is Lord of all - the word "all" appears seven times in six verses), 3. The Story of the Big Picture (The big picture of life is a story of salvation: Creation - Fall - Redemption - Consummation), and 4. The Significance of the Big Picture (Since Jesus is Lord of all, we must bring his lordship to bear on every area of life). After preaching this sermon, I prayed that God would continue to perform the work of the Word in the hearts of his people. This has become a habitual post-sermon prayer for me. More specifically, I pray that God will enable his people at Sutter Church to see that Jesus is indeed Lord of all, and that this big picture provides context, meaning, significance, and purpose to every detail of life. Moreover, it answers the fundamental questions of our existence. Where do I come from? Who am I? Why am I here? What is wrong with me and the world? Is there a solution? Is there any hope for me and the human race? What does the future hold? I am honored to have the opportunity to preach at Sutter Church, and I pray for the Holy Spirit to use my sermons to glorify God and edify his people.

Monday, August 31, 2009

Preach the Word - Part II - The Charge of Preaching

First of all, let us notice the CHARGE of preaching in verses 1-2. Paul says, "I charge you...preach the word."
Preaching is a charge. It is a command. The first person verb in verse 1 ("I charge you...") is the Greek word diamarturomai. It is a powerful word. It refers to a solemn charge that is attached to a binding duty. The verb indicates that preaching is a command of God.
Also, note that the verb in verse 2 ("preach") is in the imperative mood, which means that it is a command, a charge. This imperative verb is from the Greek word kerusso, which means to proclaim or to herald.
So then, here is Paul's meaning. He is solemnly charging Timothy to proclaim the Word of God. In other words, preaching is not an option for the Christian. It is a command. In fact, it is the command of God for the gospel minister.
Sometimes, "Christian" writers and speakers will say something clever like this, "Our message never changes, but our method changes." In some ways, this sounds extremely wise, and in some ways, this is true.
If, for example, "methods" include the style of music, then it would be true that the style of music may change, even though the message must remain the same. However, if "methods" include the act of preaching, then this would be a perversion of Scripture. For the Scriptures prescribe the method for the minister to communicate God's truth. The method for the message is preaching.
Furthermore, according to the Bible, preaching is the method that is best accommodated for the message of the gospel. Thus, the phrase "preach the word" is a charge. If we do not begin here, then nothing else will make sense to the reader. This is a foundational teaching of Scripture.

Preach the Word - Part I - Introduction

"Preach the Word" (2 Timothy 4:2). No imperative is more important for the minister of the gospel. No command is more grave. No exhortation is more sobering. At the end of his life, Paul writes to Timothy from a Roman prison. As the Apostle dictates his letter to an amanuensis, he contemplates his inevitible execution, pauses, collects his thoughts, and relates them through the scribe for young Timothy, who will receive the words in Ephesus: "For I am already being poured out as a drink offering, and the time of my departure has come" (2 Timothy 4:6). Paul is aware that he is about to die. He is conscious about the fact that he is about to stand before the Lord Jesus Christ, who is the one God has appointed to judge the living and the dead. And what does Paul say to Timothy, this young pastor, as Paul awaits his sure and certain death and considers his life in light of eternity? Paul simply says, "Timothy, preach the Word." Remarkable. It is beyond an indictment of the modern church growth strategies and the postmodern assault on the proclamation of the Word. It is a bell that rings from Mt. Zion and echoes throughout the history of the church: Preach the Word. Some pastors have heard the bell, and so they preach. But many have become dull to the Word of God and its commandment to proclaim the truth of God. Some pastors have hardened their hearts to Paul's clarion call to preach the Word. If we study 2 Timothy 4:1-5, we will discovery the importance of this solemn imperative of preaching. Although a pastor-teacher has many responsibilities, this is paramount. This sacred command must never be overlooked or underappreciated by the servant of God. It must continually ring into the minds and hearts of those who have been duly called of God to stand in the pulpit and proclaim the Word of God, which is able to make sinners wise for salvation through faith in Jesus Christ. Therefore, it is for these reasons--and there are many more reasons--that we enter into a humble exposition of this passage of Holy Scripture. We should pray for the illumination of the Spirit as we seek to understand the Scripture he inspired. So then, having provided these words of introduction, let us enter our subject with reverence.

Monday, August 24, 2009

Thank You, William Tyndale

William Tyndale was an English Reformer, Bible translator, and Christian martyr. In the words of John Foxe, Tyndale was "a true servant of God" and "a faithful minister of Christ." He was born about the borders of Wales, and he was raised in the University of Oxford. From the University of Oxford Tyndale then moved to the University of Cambridge, and he increased in his knowledge of the Scriptures and the gospel of Jesus Christ. Although Tyndale was a servant of Christ, he was a menace to the Roman Catholic Church, and he was a thorn in the side of the papacy. How did Tyndale become this English Reformer, Bible translator, and Christian martyr? The answer is simple. It was his love for the written Word of God. This may be surprising in a church culture where many Christians refuse to bring their Bibles to church. This may be astonishing in a church culture where many Christians do not read, study, and meditate upon Scripture on a daily basis. However, this was true for William Tyndale, and by the grace of God I want this to be true in my life. I was to develop an increasing love for the written Word of God so that I am willing to die for its preservation and propagation. What happened to William Tyndale? He was burned at the stake. What was his crime? He wanted to translate the Bible into the English language. Why did this frighten the Roman Catholic Church? For one reason: if ordinary people could read the Bible for themselves, then they would soon discover that there was no biblical support for the papacy or sacramentalism (salvation by automatic ritual) or purgatory or sacred tradition or the veneration of saints and on and on it would go. If Christians had the written Word of God, then Rome would lose her power, and the gospel of the grace of God would triumph over the sacramentalism and superstition. How did Tyndale have the strength to stand for Christ even when he faced death? Well, again, the answer is simple. Tyndale had a vision. He said that he looked forward to the day when "the boy that driveth the plough will know more of Scripture than the pope himself." Praise God!

ELCA - Now This is Interesting

You must read this.

Saturday, August 22, 2009

Woe to the ELCA!

This morning I received my copy of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, and I was saddened by the news about the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America (ELCA). By a vote of 559-451 the ELCA voted in favor of allowing homosexuals in committed relationships to serve as clergy. Interestingly enough, the Post-Dispatch even calls this a "shift." Yes, indeed, it is a shift. And since it is a shift from the gospel, I call the ELCA to surrender its use of the word "Evangelical." And since it is a shift from the historic position of the church, then I call the ?LCA to surrender its use of the word "Church." And since it is a shift from the views of the great Reformer, Martin Luther, I call the ?L?A to surrender the term "Lutheran." And when all the shifting is complete, we only have A, which stands for America. Yes, the ELCA has compromised so much that it now looks exactly like the godless society it should seek to transform with the gospel. Well, congratulations, ELCA, you have become the world. Brothers, we should pray for the 451 who stood strong for Christ when the vote was cast to place the stamp of approval on sin. We should pray for the Lord to stand by them, encourage them, and strengthen. They will need such strength in the days to come.

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Practicing the Presence of God

I recently finished reading Brother Lawrence's Practicing the Presence of God for the third time. Although I am not a mystic, I am challenged by the basic premise of the book: Christians should develop a moment by moment awareness of presence of Christ. In many ways, Lawrence discovered the reality of 1 Thessalonians 5:17, which says, "Pray continually." It is extremely difficult to maintain this awareness of the presence of God, but when I have maintained focus on Christ, I have experienced unspeakable joy. What if we could discipline ourselves to maintain a constant awareness of Christ at all times? Think about the blessing of such a disciplined and devoted life!

Thursday, July 23, 2009

Decisional Regeneration

Decisional Regeneration is the false teaching that the sinner decides when he will be born again (How on earth could someone believe this in light of John 3:8: "The wind blows wherever it pleases," etc.). Usually, the sinner makes a "decision for Christ" by praying the "Sinner's Prayer" and receiving Christ into his heart as his Lord and Savior. In the Bible, however, God calls sinners to repent and believe the gospel (Mark 1:15), not "bow their heads, close their eyes, and repeat after me..." Also, in order to believe, the sinner must first be born again (1 John 5:1 - consult the ESV, which is a literal translation of the Bible that reveals the tense of the Greek verbs). The new birth is emphatically not the result of the will of man (John 1:12-13). I find hte NIV translation extremely interesting: "children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband's will, but born of God." Some might say that a human decides to be born again, and then God causes them to be born again. This interpretation is ruled out by the simple observation that being "born of God" is contrasted with being born "of human decision." If this is a new concept for you, I recommend this video.

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

How to Bear Fruit - A Sermon on John 15:1-11

What is God looking for in your life? If you claim to be a follower of Christ, God is looking for fruit. God not only wants us to profess faith with our lips, but he wants us to produce fruit with our lives. Now if you are a Christian, then you probably already understand the importance of fruit bearing. After all, fruit is a recurrent theme in the Bible.

In the OT God calls Israel his vine. In Psalm 80 God says that he took Israel from Egypt, and he planted her like a vine in the land of Canaan. But in Isaiah 5 God comes to Israel, and he is looking for fruit. However, he finds no fruit on his vine. So he destroys his vine.

In the NT God continues to look for fruit in the lives of his people. In Matthew 3:8 the Pharisees and the Sadducees come to John the Baptist to be baptized in the River Jordan. When they arrive, they are greeted with these words: “Bear fruit in keeping with repentance.” R.G. Lee, the Baptist preacher, used to say, “John the Baptist ate honey, but he did not preach honey.” In his Sermon on the Mount, Jesus told us that we would recognize false prophets by their fruits. Matthew 7:16 says, “You will recognize them by their fruits.” In John 4:36 Jesus speaks about leading others to Christ as “gathering fruit for eternal life." Perhaps the most famous NT passage about fruit is Galatians 5:22-23, which lists the fruit of the Spirit: love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. In Colossians 1:6 Paul says that the gospel is bearing fruit in the whole world. In Philippians 1:11 Paul prays for the Philippian Christians to be “filled with the fruit of righteousness through Jesus Christ, to the glory and praise of God.” So fruit is a recurrent theme in the Bible because God is looking for fruit in the lives of his followers.

It is no surprise, then, that Jesus would instruct his followers on the subject of fruit bearing on the eve of his crucifixion. In John 15 Jesus tells his followers how to bear fruit. His lesson for his disciples is summarized in verse 5: “I am the vine. You are the branches. Whoever abides in me and I in him, he it is that bears much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing.” Verse 5 can be summarized in three words: “Abide in Christ.”

If we want to bear fruit, then we must abide in Christ.

I learned this lesson from my youth pastor, Richard King. John 15:5 must be one of his favorite verses because he continually quoted it. In fact, I do not remember participating in a youth retreat, a mission trip, or a service project without hearing Richard say, “Jesus said, ‘I am the vine. You are the branches. Whoever abides in me and I in him, he it is that bears much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing.’” As a youth group, we memorized this verse. We even sang this verse. No, I will not sing it for you this morning. Richard was a man who modeled for me what it means to abide in Christ and bear fruit for the glory of God.

But we need to explore abiding in Christ this morning in order to understand how to bear fruit for the glory of God. So I want to unpack the meaning of verse 5 for you. If we understand verse 5, then we understand this entire passage of Scripture. There are four components of abiding in Christ, and they are all found in verse 5 and repeated throughout verses 1 through 11.

First of all, the REALITY. “I am the vine. You are the branches.” Jesus uses the picture of the vine and the branches in order to communicate a spiritual reality. Master teachers speak in images and stories. I remember crawling into my grandfather’s lap as a young boy and listening to his stories. We called him “Poppy,” and my brother Trevor and I would crawl into his lap, and he would take out a piece of Trident gum, split it in two, and give half to my brother and the other half to me. As we sat there chewing our spearmint gum, we would listen to Poppy tell us stories with moral lessons. He told the same stories, but he told them differently each time. Well, here Jesus is teaching his followers, and he speaks to them, not with a story, but with an image, which is just as good.

Even though John 15 falls within the so-called “Upper Room Discourse,” we are confident that Jesus did not deliver his entire lesson in the upper room. In John 14:31 we can see that he and his disciples leave the upper room, and they take a journey that eventually ends up in the Garden of Gethsemane.

Scholars tell us that it would have been common in biblical days to see vines growing on trellises in the Judean countryside. Imagine Jesus walking side by side with his disciples and pointing out the grapevines, which would have grown on lattices about waist high from the ground. He looks at the vine, and he says, “I am the vine.” He then turns his eyes to Peter, James, John, Thomas, and the other disciples, and he says, “You are the branches.”

Why does Jesus speak this way? What is the meaning of this metaphor? He is talking about a spiritual reality. Even as branches are dependent on the vine for life, power, and productivity, so Jesus’ followers are dependent on him for life, power, and productivity. Here is the reality that Jesus is seeking to teach us. If you are a follower of Christ, then Jesus is your lifeline. He is your source of the life, strength, and resources that you need to live the Christian life. You are a branch, and you should remind yourself frequently of your branchlike status. Your life power is in the vine, and you only have life and power in connection with the vine.

Now some of you who claim to be followers of Christ are trying to draw life and power from another vine. It may be a job. It may be a spouse. It may be family. It may be possessions. It may be money. It may even be church activities. But even though these are good things, they are not the “true vine.” Jesus is the “true vine” (verse 1).

Let me tell you about a follower of Christ who makes a job his vine. He stops coming to church because his job is so important. He is too tired, or maybe he has to work. He stops reading his Bible and praying because it does not fit into his “work schedule.” Before you know it, this man no longer has any spiritual appetite. He is self-centered, rude, and crude. And he shakes his head wondering why his spiritual life is not flourishing.

Let me tell you about the man who makes his family his vine. Family is good, but it is not the vine. A man loves his family and supports his family. He is a true family guy, but before long he is missing church to take his children to extracurricular activities. Before long his children make getting ready for church so difficult that he no longer wants to come. He begins to make excuses about not coming to church, not reading his Bible, and not praying. And after some time, he wonders why his life is stagnant.

Here is the reality. Jesus is the vine. We are the branches. He is the source of life and power, and we will not bear fruit until we come to terms with this in our experience. You may say, “Logan, I know all that.” Yes, you probably do know all that, but do you experience all that?

Let me make an application to camp staff and counselors. The purpose of camp is to make campers fully devoted followers of Christ. But, camp staff and counselors, guess what? You cannot give what you do not have. If Jesus is not your lifeline, then you have absolutely nothing to give these campers. This is a reality, and if we want to flourish as fruitful Christians, then we must understand. Jesus is the vine. We are the branches.

So Jesus is talking about a reality. Ok, number two: RESPONSIBILITY. “Whoever abides in me and I in him…” Jesus is the vine. We are the branches. It is our responsibility to abide in Christ. Let me provide you a definition and a description of abiding in Christ.

Definition. The word “abide” or your translation may say “remain” is the Greek word meno, and it means “to abide, to remain, to dwell, to continue, to stay.” It is not a religious word. It simply means to stay. When it is used of the branches, it means to stay connected. So here is my definition of abiding in Christ. Abiding in Christ means "maintaining a close, constant, and continual connection to Christ." I like the way the ESV Study Bible defines abiding: “to continue in a daily, personal relationship with Jesus, characterized by trust, prayer, obedience, and joy.” That’s it. So here we have a definition; what about a description?

Description. Scripture interprets Scripture. In order to understand a biblical phrase we must not only define our terms, but we must also seek to understand how the phrase is used in context. As we look in John 15 we can see that when Jesus speaks of abiding in him, he is talking about abiding in his word and his love.

Abiding in Christ is informed by his word. Look in verse 7. “If you abide in me and my words abide in you…” In other words, abiding in Christ includes abiding in his word (cf. John 8:31-32). More specifically, his words must abide in us. In the words of Colossians 3:16 the word of Christ must dwell in us richly. Jesus said that the word of God is our food. Man does not live on bread alone but on every word that proceeds from the mouth of God. When we eat the word of God, we take it in. We read it, but it is not merely head knowledge. We must seek to understand it and obey it. This requires more than reading. It requires prayerful study and meditation. You cannot abide in Christ, if you neglect the word of God. Yes, we have a personal relationship with Christ, but that personal relationship is by means of the written word of God.


Abiding in Christ is inspired by his love. Look in verse 9. “As the Father has loved me, I have loved you. Abide in my love.” Now what on earth does that mean? How could we not abide in God’s love? God always loves us. Well, yes, God does always love us, but we may refuse to expose ourselves to the warmth of his love for us in Christ. The sun of God’s love is always shining, but our sin and shame may cloud and shade us from the warmth of his love. When Jesus says, “Abide in my love,” he is saying, “Stay in the sunshine of God’s love in Christ.” In the words of Jude 21, “Keep yourselves in the love of God.” We must remember moment by moment that we loved by Christ perfectly. O the deep, deep love of Jesus!

So then, abiding in Christ means that we maintain a close, constant, and continual connection with him. It is abiding in his word and love. Our relationship with Christ must be informed by the word of Christ and inspired by the love of Christ.

There is a reality, a responsibility, and, number three, there is a RESULT. Believe it or not, there is a result for abiding in Christ, and there is a result for not abiding in Christ. Essentially, it is fire or fruit.

Fire. If we do not abide in Christ, the result is fire. Look in verse 6: “If anyone does not abide in me he is thrown away like a branch and withers; and the branches are gathered, thrown in the fire, and burned.” If we do not abide in Christ, then we demonstrate that our faith is false. If our faith is false, then the vinedresser will take us away from the vine (verse 2). Branches that do not bear fruit are not true disciples. If they were true disciples, then they would abide in Jesus’ word and bear fruit (John 8:31-32). When Jesus speaks of casting fruitless branches in the fire, he is referring to the fires of hell. He is not talking about the loss of heavenly rewards. He is talking about the loss of heaven. Such branches only had superficial and artificial contact with Jesus, but they did not abide in Jesus. They did not bear fruit. As such, they are thrown into the fire.

Natalie and I have a peach tree in our backyard, and my aunt is able to make delicious peach pie from those peaches. So those peaches are extremely important to me. When I mow the lawn, I often find a few branches that have fallen away from the tree. The branches need to be moved, but it has never occurred to me to save them or try to reunite them with the tree. Instead, I take the branches, and I throw them in the lawn waste trashcan. Branches that do not bear fruit are good for nothing. So I dispose of them. So the vinedresser will do to any professing follower of Christ who does not produce fruit.

The biblical example of a fruitless branch that only had superficial and artificial contact with Jesus is Judas. Even though Judas spent a good deal of time with Jesus, he did not have faith in Jesus. He had contact with Jesus, but he was not connected to Jesus. That is the problem with many church people. They have contact with Jesus. They come to church. They hear sermons. They know the Bible. They may even pray on occasion. But they are not connected to Jesus, and hell, not heaven, awaits them. We should beware the failure to bear fruit! If we do not abide in Christ, the result is fire.


Fruit. If we abide in Christ, then the result is fruit. “Whoever abides in me and I in him, he it is that bears much fruit.” Fruit is the inevitable result of abiding in Christ. Also, if we bear fruit, then the vinedresser will prune us (verse 2), and we will bear more fruit. Pruning occurs when the Father takes his shears and cuts the shoots of sin and selfishness that inhibit us from bearing abundant fruit. Note well: if you are a fruit bearing Christian, then the Father will come to you with his shears, and he will cut you. When he cuts, he cleans (verse 3). But he does not cut you to inflict pain. He cuts you to make you a more productive, fruit bearing branch.

Ok, so there is fruit, but what does this “fruit” include? We cannot spend a great deal of time on this, but we can comment that this fruit bearing includes: prayer answered (verse 7), God glorified (verse 8), faith proven (verse 8), love demonstrated (verse 9-10), and joy fulfilled (verse 11). When we abide in Christ, the result is fruit. An abiding faith produces abundant fruit.

So we have a reality, a responsibility, a result, and, finally, we have, number four, a REASON. “For apart from me you can do nothing.” Notice that Jesus says, “nothing,” not something. But what does this mean? This means that we can do nothing of eternal significance apart from Christ.

John Piper says, “Without [Christ] you can do nothing truly good, truly God-honoring and Christ-exalting and self-abasing and eternally helpful for others” (What Jesus Demands from the World, 63).

Maybe you have heard the poem, which says, “Only one life, ‘twill soon be past; only what’s done for Christ shall last.” Well, I want to rephrase one preposition in that poem, “Only one life, ‘twill soon be past; only what’s done in Christ shall last.”

I do not care how talented and gifted you are. If you do not abide in Christ, then nothing you accomplish in this life matters. It will all burn in eternity, unless it is accomplished in, through, and for Jesus Christ. One Christmas my brother and I had asked for a Playstation (1, this way before 2, or 3) for Christmas. On Christmas morning, we opened our presents, and we received a Playstation with several games. Of course, we immediately began to set up the Playstation to our television. There was only one problem. We had an older television, and we needed an A/C adaptor in order to connect the system to our television. Think about this. We had a wonderful Playstation, and we had wonderful games, but since we were not able to connect the Playstation and television together, we were not able to play. In the same way, if you are not able to connect to Jesus Christ, you will not be able to accomplish anything for eternity.
***

What fruit are you bearing? God wants us to produce fruit that abides (cf. verse 16). What will be the impact of your life, your marriage, your employment, and your ministry on eternity? It will be significant only if it is done in Christ.

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Recommended Read: Christ-Centered Preaching


A couple of months back I finally finished a book that had been on my reading list for some time: Christ-Centered Preaching by Bryan Chapell. Chapell is the president of Covenant Theological Seminary in St. Louis, Missouri. In his work on preaching, he presents a useful and helpful homiletical model that will benefit both the seasoned preacher and seminarian alike. It goes like this:


Explanation---> Illustration--->Application

The careful preacher will weave a web of all three components to most effectively communicate the content of God's Word.


There is a singular statement that stands out to me in Chapell's book: "Explanation is for application." While application cannot properly be done until the Word is explained, application is not merely some component of exposition that can be eschewed under some misguided solus spiritus principle. The audience has the right to ask, "So what?" Many well-meaning, young Reformed preachers (of whom I am one) would do well to heed Chapell's advice here because the temptation to turn a sermon into an "oral essay" is strong. By following Chapell's model of redemptive preaching, sermons will avoid this pitfall. However, by emphasizing each chain of the so called "double helix", the preacher will avoid turning his sermons into therapuetic drivel as well. In his irenic way, Chapell avoids the extremes of turning preaching into either a lecture or a psychological pep talk. To put it simply, he is balanced and that alone should make his discussion of preaching appealing.


Many homiletic texts read in a cumbersome fashion because of the technical language that the discipline involves. Chapell's style, however, is both at once meticulous and perspicuous. He writes in a way that is understandable without marginalizing the reader who is coming to such concepts for the first time. In addition to this, Chapell provides useful helps in the appendices at the end of the book. It does not matter if you are a young preacher or a veteran preacher. Get this book in your library!

Friday, June 19, 2009

Blogging for the Glory of God

I apologize to our small readership for my intermittent blogging as of late. During my hiatus, I have spent time reassessing my goal in blogging. Why do I blog? Am I obeying 1 Corinthians 10:31 in the posts that I make? And most foundationally: why blog? Here are some of the good reasons that I blog:

1. Blogging allows me to communicate gospel truths to an audience that I would not be able to have apart from this forum.
2. Blogging is an easy and accessible way to keep honing and improving my writing craft.
3. Blogging presents an interesting challenge: how to say more with less.
4. Blogging is a way to further interact with the Biblical text you are reading as well as other edifying books.
5. Blogging gives me an opportunity to further assess "aha" moments that I might otherwise miss.

Some dangerous reasons to blog:

1. Narcissism. This is pervasive in our culture today. With the advent of social networking sites like Facebook and MySpace, it is easy to mistake the right to speak with the right to be heard.
2. Self-preservation. There is a feeling of permanency to what we write. Deep within the human heart is a desire to make something truly lasting. Living for the glory of our name is in direct opposition to living for the glory of God's name however.
3. Relationships. Yes, this can also be a dangerous reason to blog. If you long for genuine, meaningful relationships with someone, don't try to maintain it through a blog.

As with any technology, blogging is not inherently evil. The list above is not an exhaustive one. There are more good reasons to blog and there are more dangers to be avoided. So, I ask you, why do you blog?

Calvin the Charismatic?

This morning I stumbled upon this while browsing another blog:

The inward attitude certainly holds first place in prayer, but outward signs, kneeling, uncovering the head, lifting up the hands, have a twofold use. The first is that we may employ all our members for the glory and worship of God; secondly, that we are, so to speak, jolted out of our laziness by this help. There is also a third use in solemn and public prayer, because in this way the sons of God profess their piety, and they inflame each other with reverence of God. But just as the lifting up of the hands is a symbol of confidence and longing, so in order to show our humility, we fall down on our knees. (John Calvin, Commentary on Acts 20:36)

Who says that physical expressiveness in worship is incompatible with the Reformed tradition?

Thursday, June 18, 2009

C.S. Lewis on Art for Art's Sake

"'How soon do you think I could begin painting?' it asked.
The Spirit broke into laughter. 'Don't you see you'll never paint at all if that's what you're thinking about?' he said.
'What do you mean?' asked the Ghost.
'Why, if you are interested in the country only for the sake of painting it, you'll never learn to see the country.'
'But that's just how a real artist is interested in the country.'
'No. You're forgetting," said the Spirit. 'That was not how you began. Light itself was your first love: you loved paint only as a means of telling about light.'" -C.S. Lewis, The Great Divorce p.80-81

While enjoying art for art's sake as an ultimate end of itself is dangerously idolatrous, don't writers, musicians, painters, sculpters who attempt art "only as a means of telling about light" end up producing kitsch? Doesn't this form of didacticism miss the primary point about art?

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Preaching the Ascension of Jesus Christ

For those of you who may be unaware, this upcoming Lord's Day is Ascension Day, and even though I do not follow the church liturgical calendar in my preaching, my senior pastor asked me to preach on the Ascension. I agreed to do so for at least two reasons: (1) I have always wanted to preach on the Ascension and planned to do so, and (2) the Ascension is a neglected doctrine in the church today, and I must honestly admit that I am unable to answer some questions about the Ascension in my own thinking. In any event, church calendars aside, I was eager to comply with my pastor's request.

As I have studied the Ascension in depth over the past week or so, I have been amazed at the variety of texts that touch upon this important aspect of the work of Christ. Before my study, I knew that Luke 24:50-53 and Acts 1:9-11 were the major texts. If I really thought things through, and you caught me on a good day, then I might also add Mark 16:19, though a disputed text, and John 20:17. Indeed, Paul assumes the ascension when he speaks of Christ at the right hand of God, as head of the church, as Lord above all, etc. He also explicitly refers to the ascension in Ephesians 4:8-10, which is often avoided because of the controversy over the meaning of his "descent" (earth, hell, etc.) and the alleged misquotation of Psalm 68:18.

Interestingly enough, Calvin seems to make Ephesians 4:8-10 a central verse in his thinking about the Ascension, especially verse 10b, which says, "...that he might fill all things." We also find discussions of the ascension in Calvin's treatment on the Lord's Supper in order to contest the assertion of Luther and others that Christ can be physically present in the bread and wine while remaining at the right hand of God in his physical body. In any event, when you think about the Ascension of Christ, there are many texts to consider (probably more than you ever imagined): Matthew 26:64 and parallels, John 3:13, John 6:62, John 13:3, many references in John 14-17 (going back to the Father, etc.), Acts 2:33-36, Ephesians 1:20-23, Hebrews 1:3, 9:24 and about a dozen other places in Hebrews, 1 Peter 3:22, and others.

With respect to the OT, the Ascension is almost always connected with Psalm 110:1, and in Matthew 26:64 (cf. Gospel parallels, too) Psalm 110:1 and Daniel 7:13-14 are merged into one picture.

The author of Hebrews uses Psalm 110 to establish the fact that the Christ is not only an ascended King (110:1), but he is also an exalted Priest (110:4).

In the book of Acts, I would say that the emphasis is upon Jesus as ascended king, and in the book of Hebrews the emphasis is upon Jesus as ascended high priest. So when considering the Ascension, it is also important to think about the three offices of Christ: prophet, priest, and king.

As you can see, the more you study of the Ascension of Christ, the more you realize that your mind is inadequate to understand the glory of this aspect of his exaltation (Reformed Theology distinguishes four stages of the exaltation of Christ: Resurrection, Ascension, Session, and Second Coming).

Now what does this have to do with preaching? Well, it means that when we preach, we should always be selective. No matter what I preach this upcoming Lord's Day, I will not be able to preach everything there is to preach on the Ascension, which is good news and bad news.

It is good news because it means that this truth is that rich, but it is bad news because it means that I can only preach about 15% of what I have studied and learned over the past week.

Second, this also means that when preaching the key events of Jesus' saving work, it is difficult to preach a strictly expository sermon. In other words, it is much easier to preach a textual, thematic, theological sermon. This is not a sin, but it may bother some who are committed to strict verse by verse exposition. However, and this is especially true if you are preaching on a narrative text like Luke 24 or Acts 1, the narrative demands to be explained and applied, and since this is the work of the epistles and other NT documents, we should not be afraid to use them to illumine the Scripture when necessary.

Let me provide an example. When I preach from Acts 1:6-11, I will talk under one point about the fact that Jesus ascended into heaven in order to prepare a place for us in heaven. However, when you read through those verses you will look long and hard to find that truth, except for one fact. That fact is the observation that Luke tells us that Jesus went into heaven, which causes us to think, "Why did Jesus go into heaven? Did he tell us?" So in order to understand why, we need to look to Jesus' words in John 14:2. Now here is the key. We would not do this in an exegesis in a critical commentary, but we would and should do this in an exposition in a sermon. We do this to elucidate the meaning and significance of the Scripture. Here I am elucidating the significance, not the meaning, but it is a good thing to do in an exposition. So, when preaching on the saving work of Jesus, we will need to be thematic in order to provide a complete picture.

These are just some thoughts that I have entertained this past week in sermon prep...

Monday, May 18, 2009

Ten Reasons I Give for Why I Am Not Gossiping (When I Really Am)

"And the tongue is a fire, a world of unrighteousness. The tongue is set among our members, staining the whole body, setting on fire the entire course of life, and set on fire by hell." -James 3:6 (ESV)


1. "I am seeking counsel."
2. "I am venting."
3. "I am making a prayer request."
4. "I would say this to the person's face (lie)."
5. "I am talking to my wife and I can't keep secrets from her."
6. "This is true."
7. "I am warning him so that he does not fall into the same kind of temptation."
8. "I am making conversation."
9. "This is public knowledge (lie)."
10. "This information is pertinent to the story I am sharing."

What is on your list?

Thursday, May 14, 2009

Abusing the Love of God - Another Example

Rembert G. Weakland was an archbishop in the Roman Catholic Church, but his career came quickly to an end (2002) when a man whom he had paid $450,000 to keep his mouth shut about their romantic involvement, appeared on ABC's "Good Morning America," claiming that Weakland had "raped" him. His story can be read here.


Archbishop Weakland was already a liberal voice in the RCC before his early "retirement," but after he resigned from his position as archbishop, he became even more outspoken against the church's teaching on homosexuality.


Interestingly enough, in an article from the NY Times we read Weakland's rationale:


"If we say our God is an all-loving god,” he said, “how do you explain that at any given time probably 400 million living on the planet at one time would be gay? Are the religions of the world, as does Catholicism, saying to those hundreds of millions of people, you have to pass your whole life without any physical, genital expression of that love?”


Well, no Christian is surprised by Weakland's rationale. In fact, sinners have been (ab)using the love of God since the Fall. However, it is an abuse of the love of God to use the love of God as an excuse for sin. I wonder if the Arminian sentimentalism of the love of God has contributed to the use of the love of God as an excuse for sin... Just some food for thought.

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

John Piper Speaks Prophetically Against the Sin of Abortion

This is awesome. Listen here. John Piper says, "No, Mr. President, we stand for the sanctity of human life because human life is made in the image of God (Genesis 1:27). Christians should weep for America because pro-life legislation is quickly overturned by our new President. Make no mistake about it. Mr. Obama is the strongest pro-death candidate ever to set foot in the White House. And make no mistake about it. The God of glory THUNDERS. May God help us all!

Monday, May 11, 2009

No Place for Truth

I never cease to be amazed at the constant disregard of absolute truth in the news media. This evening I read an article about the Hubble Space Telescope. In the article, I was shocked by the following sentence:

"In Hubble's photos, believers witness the hand of God, nonbelievers see astronomy in action, and artists discover galaxies worthy of galleries."

Now, when I read this sentence, I make the following observations:

1. The sentence avoids making any absolute truth claim whatsoever.

2. This is accomplished by placing a greater emphasis on experience.

3. In doing so, the sentence trivializes the reality of absolute truth.

Moreover, this sentence is strange. Think about the list of spectators: believers, unbelievers, and artists. Well, I suppose we can learn one important lesson from this sentence. In a postmodern world, truth is only found in "the eyes of the beholder." Clearly, there is no place for truth in the news media.

Friday, May 8, 2009

Sermons

My sermons are now available online. The website is still under construction, and the most recent sermon is from November. But you should be able to access the sermons soon. You can listen here.

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Reclaiming the Arts: In Defense of a Calvinistic Poetic, Part I

In contradistinction to the elevation of reason that characterized the Enlightenment and Modernism, our post-everything culture has exchanged this edifice for one more befitting its "beyond propositional" mantra: art. Facing such a cultural milieu, Christians should rejoice that reason has been exchanged for art not because truth cannot be encapsulated in propositions, but because truth cannot only be encapsulated in propositions. There is a kind of knowledge in the gospel that while not against reason is essentially different from reason. God in his grace has disclosed certain truths about his character that we would not know apart from revelation. In many ways, the unfolding of this revelation in Scripture is best understood as art. This is not to deny the propositional truths of Scripture, but to say that they are most fully understood in the wider backdrop of the redemptive metanarrative. The Bible is not to be read as a systematic theology or we would not need systematic theologies. The Bible is literature or, rather, a variety of literary works. In this sacred text, we find the foundational inspiration for all art: the fusing of the transcendent and the imminent. It is this dichotomous union that leaves its traces throughout the story of redemption. The wedding of the transcendent and the imminent is found in nearly every tenet of Christianity: the deity and humanity of Christ, the sovereignty of God and the responsibility of man, the divine and human agency of inspiration, the old covenant and the new covenant, and, ultimately the reconciliation of heaven and earth. It is this fusion that serves both to explain and to guide a Christian approach to the arts. Not only does it address the artist's most difficult dichotomy of form and content, but it also ensures that art, as a representation of the human condition, depicts both beauty and truth. While the Reformation is typically stigmatized as a movement that was antithetical to artistic pursuits, this caricature fails under closer scrutiny. Though an explicit Calvinistic aesthetic is seldom articulated (much of later Calvinism has been preoccupied with polemics), the one that emerges is in fact informed by the dichotomous union of transcendence and imminence. Our focus will be a bit more myopic as we look not more broadly at aesthetics, which pertains to the arts in general, but to poetics, which is a philosophy of literature in particular.

Before considering how the dichotomous union is central to a Reformational poetic, let us address the common objection that the Reformed tradition is resistant to the arts. Though not an accurate assessment, such an objection is not completely without merit. In the early hours of the Reformation, there was much open hostility to the use of art in corporate worship as a reaction against the abuses of Rome. When the decisive break finally occurred, the Reformers rightly asked what should constitute Sabbath worship. The consensus was that Rome's use of visual art in corporate worship violated the second commandment. While Old Testament temple worship included sculptures of the celestial beings, the Reformers argued, New Testament worship should be patterned after the apostolic precedent of simplicity: Bible reading, prayer, singing, and the sacraments. Rome's incorporation of art in corporate worship undermined the truth that the ceremonial art of Old Testament temple worship were types of a heavenly copy that has been inaugurated in the life, death, and resurrection of Christ. In addition, the Regulative Principle was determined to be the guiding force for the form and content of corporate worship. Only what God explicitly commands in Scripture should dictate the subject and manner of our worship. Thus, it was not so much that the Reformers eliminated art in corporate worship but they simply advocated it in a different form. For really there is the art of the homily, the art of singing, and the overarching art of the whole liturgy. In fact, it can be argued that the Reformational worldview liberated the Christian world from a utilitarian perspective on the arts. It is to this subject that we must turn our attention.

An Unfortunate Utilitarianism

The assertion that religious art pervaded the Pre-Reformation period goes largely uncontested. Rome, in its understanding of the sacred, esteemed art as having value only so far as it depicted subjects explicitly religious in nature, hence the ubiquitious Madonna and child paintings of the 15th and 16th centuries. With the emergence of the Reformed world-in-life view, the sacred/secular distinction was eradicated. According to the Reformers all of life was worship. Whether at work, church, or play, everything is to be done to the glory of God. A paradigm shift of this magnitude meant a complete redefining of what constituted Christian service. The blacksmith was not a Christian blacksmith, because he emblazoned the name "Jesus" on his tools but because he was a good blacksmith. We can see how this applies to the artist and more specifically the writer. A writer's work does not bring glory to God because he deals explicitly with matters of faith, but because he writes material that is beautiful and true. In our contemporary context, the "Christian" writer is often not taken seriously, because he is confined only to dealing with the explicitly religious. However, the Reformed view that all of life is sacred removes such an unnecessary burden. While books of theology, devotion, and much that is displayed as "Christian fiction" in bookstores talk about faith directly, literature uses faith as a lens through which to present the human condition. What gives the two branches of literature, fiction and poetry, such value is that they are able to do what theological books cannot: they make you feel faith rather than just understand it. Literature puts skin on theological truths. Even if we do not preoccupy ourselves with seeing evangelistic truths in literature, we can ruin our enjoyment of a piece if we focus too much on determining the meaning. The experience is the meaning. The reason literature is so powerful is because it communicates something that a simple statement could not. If a statement would have been sufficient, then the author would not need to write the piece.

Some people have the notion that you read the story and then climb out of it into the meaning, but for the fiction writer himself, the whole story is the meaning, because it is an experience, not an abstraction.
-Mystery and Manners, Flannery O'Connor (73)


The removal of the sacred/secular distinction releases the harness around the Christian imagination, and allows it to roam freely in the open plains of pleasure and experience. However, given the guiding principle of sola scriptura in the Reformers' life and thought, how did they seek to justify such a new perspective on the Christian calling? Drawing from the cultural mandate in Genesis 1:28, the Reformers correctly understood that the message of redemption throughout Scripture included culture. Thus, a redeemed earth assumed a redeemed culture as well. This mandate and its implications for the Christian writer will be examined in further detail in Part II.

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Ad Honorem: Logan Almy


In the next four hours, I will be flying to St. Louis where I will reconvene with friends and family to celebrate the ordination of my brother, Logan Almy. Ordination is a serious time in which men of sound doctrine and character are called to "rightly handle the Word of truth (2 Tim. 2:15)." I could not think of a man for which this verse more aptly describes than Logan. In light of this milestone in his life, I would like to offer a brief tribute to this godly man.

I have repeated this several times, but it is worth being said again: Logan is a friend to me before he is a brother. By this I mean that he has gone above and beyond mere filial obligations by rebuking, encouraging, and edifying me. He has hidden Proverbs 28:23 in his heart and sought to incarnate it in his actions. Through daybreak and noon, times of laughter and times of weeping, Logan has demonstrated true friendship through his loyalty. A man could give him no higher praise than to say that he proves his love for God by his love for his brother (cf.1 John 4:20-21).

This Sunday Logan will be preaching during the AM sermon at Sutter Presbyterian Church. The title of his message will be: "The Supreme Joy of the Justified Sinner" taken from Phil. 3:1-11. I eagerly look forward to another God-saturated, Spirit-filled sermon. Logan's commitment to expository preaching and bold proclamation of the truth is unmatched by anyone I have met and I pray the Lord would continue to increase his resolve. Soli deo gloria!

Monday, February 16, 2009

What is Baptism?

When we consider the sacred rite of baptism, it is necessary to understand both its significance and its application. First, the significance of baptism.

As a result of the emergence of a man-centered view of redemption, there has been a corresponding rise in a man-centered view of the sacrament of baptism. This should really come as no surprise since baptism is the initiatory rite of being ushered into the visible people of God. If the church's view of redemption is man-centered, then baptism which points to redemption will be seen in a man-centered way. In other words, baptism is seen in many evangelical circles as pointing to the individual's personal faith and repentance. This is exactly the opposite of what baptism, or any other covenant sign in Scripture, is meant to do. Signs are markers which serve to remind (however anthropromorphic it may sound) the suzerain God of his objective promise. It is not a sign of some inward change. This was the case in every covenant in the OT and continues to be so with baptism. Let us look at some examples:

8 Then God spoke to Noah and to his sons with him, saying, 9 “Now behold, I Myself do establish My covenant with you, and with your descendants after you; 10 and with every living creature that is with you, the birds, the cattle, and every beast of the earth with you; of all that comes out of the ark, even every beast of the earth. 11 “I establish My covenant with you; and all flesh shall never again be cut off by the water of the flood, neither shall there again be a flood to destroy the earth.” 12 God said, “This is the sign of the covenant which I am making between Me and you and every living creature that is with you, for all successive generations; 13 I set My bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a sign of a covenant between Me and the earth. 14 “It shall come about, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow will be seen in the cloud, 15 and I will remember My covenant, which is between Me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and never again shall the water become a flood to destroy all flesh. 16 “When the bow is in the cloud, then I will look upon it, to remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is on the earth.” 17 And God said to Noah, “This is the sign of the covenant which I have established between Me and all flesh that is on the earth.” -Genesis 9:8-17

Notice, the purpose of the sign of the covenant is so that God "will remember" his covenant (v.15. The sign of the covenant (i.e. the rainbow) is not pointing to some subjective, inward disposition within Noah. It is not a sign of Noah's personal faith in the promise of the covenant. It is a sign to remind God of God's promise. To put another way, it is outward and objective rather than inward and subjective. Here is another one:

9 God said further to Abraham, “Now as for you, you shall keep My covenant, you and your descendants after you throughout their generations. 10 “This is My covenant, which you shall keep, between Me and you and your descendants after you: every male among you shall be circumcised. 11 “And you shall be circumcised in the flesh of your foreskin, and it shall be the sign of the covenant between Me and you. 12 “And every male among you who is eight days old shall be circumcised throughout your generations, a servant who is born in the house or who is bought with money from any foreigner, who is not of your descendants. 13 “A servant who is born in your house or who is bought with your money shall surely be circumcised; thus shall My covenant be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant. 14 “But an uncircumcised male who is not circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin, that person shall be cut off from his people; he has broken My covenant.” -Genesis 17:9-14

The sign of the Abrahamic covenant is the bloody rite of circumcision. Was circumcision a sign of the inward, subjective disposition of the recipient? Verses 12-13 clearly demonstrate it was not, because every male in Israel was circumcised even those who would later demonstrate unbelief. What exactly does circumcision then signify? Paul, who also calls the Abrahamic covenant the gospel in Galatians 3:8, says this regarding what circumcision signifies:

11 and in Him you were also circumcised with a circumcision made without hands, in the removal of the body of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ; 12 having been buried with Him in baptism, in which you were also raised up with Him through faith in the working of God, who raised Him from the dead. -Colossians 2:11-12

While many credobaptists may want to object and say that Paul does not say that baptism replaces circumcision in this text, that is not the point. The point is that what Paul does state is that both circumcision and baptism convey the same spiritual reality, that is, the objective work of Christ in dying and purging us of the sinfulness of the flesh. Circumcision is the bloody rite which looks forward to this event while baptism is the bloodless rite which looks back. Neither, however, are necessarily intended to signify something about the individual recipient.

In regards to the application of the sign of baptism, I will propose this. When we correctly understand the significance of baptism, then the application of baptism flows from it. What I mean by this is that a God-centered view of baptism's significance results in a corporate-oriented view of baptism's application. If the significance of baptism is really meant to point to the outward, objective work of God in Christ and as a reminder to God and His people of that work, then the administration of baptism is not dependent upon knowing the internal disposition of the recipients. To clarify, no one who supports covenant baptism would advocate baptizing someone who is demonstrating unbelief and hatred towards the gospel. Such an idea is monstrous! With the case of infants, we do not know if they possess saving faith or not. Fortunately, this is not the criterion upon which we must determine whether or not to baptize an individual. The criterion is based upon God's objective promise through the gospel to believing households! This enables us then to take Peter's promise seriously in Acts 2:39 that the promise of the New Covenant is to believers and their children. Soli deo gloria!